Skip to main content

The Demon of Maxwell

South African author Joan De La Haye offers Demon Friday. Surprisingly, it's each Friday and it involves a demon from one grimoire or another. She also greets us as 'freaky darlings', similar to Vampira. Top class!

This is my own take on Demon Friday, except it's not always on Fridays and it doesn't feature real demons or pictures of real demons. Sorry.

These are all my posts on demons:

  1. The demon of Laplace, regarding probability.

  2. The demon of Maxwell, regarding thermodynamics.

  3. The demon of Descartes, designed to invoke skepticism.

  4. The demon of Morton, designed to make one aware of confirmation bias.

Maxwell's demon is a thought experiment proposed by James Clerk Maxwell. Maxwell invented the demon to attempt to show that the second law of thermodynamics is only a statistical anomaly and not a rigid, unbreakable law. Like the law that prevents Ozzy Osbourne from taking a slash on the Alamo cenotaph.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics Revisited

Remember that the second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of the universe tends to a maximum, or stated differently: you can not win.

Megan Fox naked from the waist down

Megan Fox. Like a young Angelina Jolie with gimp feet.

Thus, the second law of thermodynamics states that the universe is in a state of universal decay. That's right, Lady Gaga and Megan Fox are not going to be sex symbols for all eternity. An almost famous Spinal Tap quote has it that:

“Well, Nigel and Dave are two extremes, like fire and ice. I see my role in the band is to be somewhere in between... like lukewarm water.”

Which illustrates the second law of thermodynamics perfectly. The second law requires that there is an energy flow between bodies until an equilibrium is reached. This means that fire, which is in a more chaotic state than ice, would cause ice to take on a more chaotic state. By the same token, ice would cause fire to take on a slightly less chaotic state, until the luke warm water somewhere in between becomes apparent.

Maxwell's Demon and the Luke Warm Water Somewhere in Between

Suggest that we have a container with blue coloured ice water. We pour a cup of red coloured scolding water into this container. According to the second law of thermodynamics, we ought to end up with luke warm purple water, but not if Maxwell's demon has his way.

Maxwell's demon is a hypothetical creature that can discern between the molecules of the ice water and those of the boiling water by sensing its energy levels. Maxwell claims that his demon would thus be able to separate the blue ice water molecules from the red scolding water molecules. His demon would do so by means of a trap door.

This means that, if such a demon existed, the second law of thermodynamics would be broken, as it is hypothetically possible to move from a currently more chaotic purple state to a previously less chaotic red and blue state. If entropy is symmetrically reversible, it means that there are ways to overcome the problem that the universe tends to maximum entropy. It also means that Megan Fox and Lady Gaga can stay hot for ever. Great...

More importantly, it means that perpetual motion is possible. Which would be nice considering that loads of our oil has been spilt in the Gulf of Mexico by BP. I'm not sure if Maxwell's demon would be a convincing argument for mortgage refinancing, but it's worth a shot.


Popular posts from this blog

Fist bump the Trump

I must confess that I did not follow this election as it unfolded, because I have no skin in this game. I only became interested when I saw the crocodile tears on Facebook.

What fascinated me more was that the Trump supporters came out of the closet for the first time to voice their opinions. Virtually none of these Trump supporters espoused racist, misogynistic or any of those kind of deplorable views. Most of them were just pointing fingers at the know-it-all Clinton supporters.

What characterised this election? Rather than enlightened liberals waging a culture war with backward rednecks and hayseeds, three things characterised this election for me:
Shared hubris: Our candidate is bad, but the other candidate is even worse. Both parties seemed to espouse this sentiment.Joe Sixpack's Revenge: Based on voter turnout and based on for whom the largest voting group voted, this election was the revenge of the average American. That is average American by sheer number. Nobody bothered t…

Why has outrage come to dominate platforms like Twitter?

This question was posted on twitter by Sarah Britten Pillay. I shall try to answer that here, or at least address some of the topics surrounding this notion.

What makes a platform like Twitter more outrageous than the next? A brief summary of my thoughts on the topic: It would be interesting to contrive some outrage meter that could detect outrage levels in a piece of text.Plenty if not most of social media outrage is manufactured as a distraction.Outrage that isn't manufactured can be analysed by means of kin selection concepts from biology.If you aren't entirely sold on the sociobiology idea, then the balance of risk and incentive from game theory can also shed some light on the rationale behind social media outrage. Outrage levels are too damn high I do agree that social media platforms tend to be filled with more outrage than others, but as far as I know there is no means of detecting or measuring outrage. The need exists for some outrage quotient or some method of classify…

White tears the most valuable currency but not as valuable as fauxtrage

This formerly glorious publication which I shall not even bother naming has also fallen into the habit of censoring its comments section, at least when it comes to white tears. Fortunately, I could still save this obviously far superior comment from the rather myopic agitprop from whence it came. I know it is superior because the quality of your commentary is inversely proportional to how long it stays unscathed. That's why the sanctimonious finger-wagging op-eds rarely get deleted, but the comments rarely last long.
Anyone - black or white or of any other pigmentation persuasion - with a Rhodes Scholarship can but only cry White Tears. Someone with a Rhodes Scholarship is in the very lap of privilege, the likes of which not even the majority of pale South Africans born with a silver spoon will ever see. That is why it is not uncommon to see their ilk waiting on tables instead of whipping their slaves on their ill-begotten land, which they refuse to give up, you see.
A similar campa…